
[Update: The original shot I posted was, I thought, too light. This is an updated version.] Another shot from my tours of Battery Park City. If you’re getting sick of said locale, I’ll tell you, you’re not alone. I’m not feeling uninspired there or anything — quite the opposite, really — but when I browse my images afterward I feel like so many of them have the same fences, lightposts, bricks, and/or benches and it gets a little repetitive. But, when I try going somewhere else (two days ago I took a walk around Union Square and then the Upper East and West Sides) I don’t take many photos at all, whereas when I go to my “stomping grounds,” as it were, I fill my 1GB memory card. Which got me thinking — ruminating, if you will.
I realized that I don’t take very good pictures — or even take any at all — in a place that I don’t understand. I suppose it’s a photojournalistic thing, but, for instance, in Union Square, I couldn’t really get a hold on the people there or what they were thinking or how a photo could show the life that undoubtedly fills that place. And that is, after all, what I’m trying to capture: life. So when I can’t get a feel for it, the pictures I take rapidly turn into generic aesthetic patterns that don’t really evoke what I want them to evoke. And so I end up hitting the trash can button on my camera a lot.
On the other hand, like me and my Battery Park City, when I’m comfortable in a place, it means I’ve already come to understand what it is and what the people are doing there, so I can fire at will with the shutter. And I do.
The main caveat being, of course, becoming too comfortable with a spot (something I experienced both in La Crosse and at Middlebury and at my cabin), because it’s precisely then that I stop noticing the things that I need to notice to keep on bringing the camera to my eye. When I was up at my cabin, I took the house, the driveway, the boats, the lake — even the wildlife — for granted as always being there and always having been there. When I looked at the woodshed, I didn’t think how a cool angle would make the light bounce a certain way or if I got really close the grains in the logs would form a pattern. I would just say, “yep, there’s the woodshed” and move on. And on and on.
Thus, I’ve set out trying to understand different places. I’m starting to get a handle on the Financial District (inland), so I’m pretty satisfied with some of the shots I got today, and I feel like if I went back to the Upper West Side I’d know what to look for there, too. Right now, though, it’s mostly the landscape around my apartment.
There was one shot that I really would have liked to take last night, though, but I didn’t have my camera because I was out with Chorn and Craigulate: Near Union Square (we decided to go out near NYU), a woman was sitting crosslegged in front of a deli-type place, slumped over and passed out, her hands splaying out in front of her onto the sidewalk. The coolest thing about her was that she had been smoking a cigarette before she passed out and the cigarette was on the ground — still burning — between where her fingers would have been holding it. I was mad that I didn’t have any way to take a picture, so I’m going back tomorrow in the hopes that I’ll find something similar.
4 Comments
September 17, 2005 at 8:35 pm
I thought of Andy Goldsworthy while reading your entry, Cog. Another one (indeed, another Andy) for whom the importance of understanding a place–or, at least, being comfortable enough in a place to ruminate on it, as you say–is paramount to his artistic success. It’s actually quite impressive how quickly you have found the vein of life in your particular area; and I commend you for searching out new spots. New York shall be your river, the camera your pan. Find the gold.
Ok, that last part was a little dorky. But seriously. And I like this shot very much. Perfect DOF, humorous addition of the pigeon (which are innately humorous, of course). Even an interesting perspective and background, with the subject sort of cradled between the trees. Well done.
September 17, 2005 at 8:37 pm
And to all y’all people who care about correct English: the semicolon is misplaced in the above comment, and I intended to have a paragraph break before “OK…” for emphasis. Alas.
September 18, 2005 at 1:14 pm
Ando–I just saw Crash last night. Have you seen that yet? If not, rent it. It’s amazing!
January 2, 2009 at 12:50 pm
4b car part 6 part car